K
Power Semiconductors

RIR Power Electronics

RIRLBSEMicro Cap

Power semiconductor manufacturer with thyristors, rectifiers and emerging SiC device capability.

Market Cap
₹800 cr
Price
580
1Y 28%
Direct exposure
95/100
0–100 directness
Hold / Watchlist
Fundamental
64/ 100
B+

Quality of growth, returns, cash conversion and balance sheet

Technical (TQ-100)
66/ 100
B+

Trend, momentum, volume and relative strength composite

Valuation
38/ 100

Higher = cheaper vs peers and own history

Final composite
58/ 100

Blended decision input

Data transparency

What's real, what's pending, on this page

Financials pending
✓ Real / verified
  • · Live price, day change, market cap — NSE direct
  • · 1Y OHLCV, RSI(14), 50/200 DMA, 1M/3M/1Y returns, RS vs Nifty — computed from real NSE OHLCV
  • · Sector P/E — NSE direct
  • · Promoter %, pledge %, MF/FII/public split, 9-quarter history — Trendlyne
  • · Earnings call AI summaries — Trendlyne (where available)
  • · Technical (TQ-100) score — computed from real OHLCV
⚠ Pending real Trendlyne extraction
  • · Revenue, EBITDA, PAT, OCF, Capex, FCF, net debt — pending
  • · Top-card ratios + valuation multiples — pending real recompute
  • · Fundamental score + final composite + decision — pending real recompute
  • · Segment classification + semicon directness score — analyst seed
  • · Bull/bear case + monitorables (curated thesis) — analyst seed
  • · Governance risk score (seed) — being replaced by AI-agent assessment
  • · Synthesized 5Y forecast removed entirely (was inaccurate)
Real financials extracted for 42 of 45 companies. This company is in the remaining 3 — Trendlyne entry not found (RIRL / AMIORG / ASMS). See /data-sources for full provenance.
RIR Power Electronics · RIRL
580+49.33% over 6M
Price50 DMA200 DMA
RSI (14)
Momentum oscillator · 6M view
Volume (60D)
Fundamental score (SageOne 100)
56/ 100B

Growth 20 / Margin 15 / ROC 20 / Cash 15 / Leverage 10 / Reinvestment 8 / Accounting 7 / Governance 5 minus red flags (capped -20).

Base 60
Red flags -4
Growth quality/ 20
20.0
Rev 1Y 28.0% · 3Y CAGR 32.0%
Margin & profitability/ 15
7.5
EBITDA 16.0% · PAT 9.0%
Return on capital/ 20
10.4
ROCE 18% · ROE 16%
Cash flow quality/ 15
3.8
OCF/EBITDA 30% · FCF yield 0.3%
Leverage discipline/ 10
7.3
Net Debt/EBITDA 0.80x
Reinvestment runway/ 8
4.8
ROCE × retention proxy
Accounting quality/ 7
2.6
OCF conversion proxy
Governance/ 5
3.6
Pledge 0.0% · Risk 28/100
Red flags (1)
  • Weak cash conversionOCF/EBITDA 30% < 50%-4
⚠ Pending — Trendlyne entry not found for this ticker.
Technical score (TQ-100)
81/ 100A

Computed from real 1Y OHLCV pulled from NSE direct: trend, momentum, volume, RS vs Nifty, MA cluster, mean reversion, volatility, patterns minus red flags.

Base 81
Trend structure/ 20
18.7
Above 200DMA · -16% from 52W high
Momentum velocity/ 15
15.0
RSI(14) 56 · 1M 4.0%
Volume dynamics/ 15
6.0
Bucket: Micro Cap
Relative strength/ 15
10.5
RS vs Nifty 12%
MA cluster/ 10
10.0
200DMA + 1Y trend confirmation
Mean-reversion runway/ 10
9.7
RSI(14) 56; ideal 50-60
Volatility profile/ 8
3.6
Bucket: Micro Cap
Pattern integrity/ 7
7.0
Trend continuation proxy

AI research agents

Re-classify segment exposure and re-assess governance risk by running fresh AI agents on the latest data. Results cache to data/agents.json.

Segment classifier
Maps to value-chain segments + computes 0-100 directness
Seed: Power Semiconductors · 95/100
Governance assessor
Forensic-accounting flags + 0-100 risk score
Seed: 28/100 risk

AI thesis

Generates a fresh thesis grounded in this company's data. Wires to Anthropic when ANTHROPIC_API_KEY is set, otherwise returns a deterministic mock.

Curated thesis

Analyst-set bull, bear and monitorables · use AI thesis above for a fresh take

Niche listed power semiconductor name with SiC optionality; small but a real pure-play.

Bull case
  • +SiC capability ramp
  • +Pure-play power semis
  • +EV / renewable demand
Bear case
  • Small scale vs global peers
  • Customer qualification cycles
  • Liquidity
Key monitorables
SiC commercializationRevenue mix shiftWorking capital

Semiconductor exposure

How direct, how visible

Primary segment
Power Semiconductors
All segments
Power Semiconductors
Exposure type
Direct
Policy beneficiary
Yes
Import substitution
High
Governance risk score
28/100 (lower = better)

Financial snapshot

Latest reported metrics · mock data, ready for live financials

Rev growth (1Y)
28.0%
Rev CAGR (3Y)
32.0%
EBITDA margin
16.0%
PAT margin
9.0%
ROCE
18%
ROE
16%
OCF / EBITDA
30%
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.8x
Promoter holding
56.0%
Promoter pledge
0.0%
Valuation
P/E (TTM)
52.0
Forward P/E
36.0
EV/EBITDA
28.0
EV/Sales
4.5
P/B
6.5
FCF Yield
0.3%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
Hist. percentile
70%
Peer percentile
70%
Technicals
RSI(14)
56
1M return
4.0%
1Y return
28%
From 52W high
-16%
RS vs Nifty
12%
>200 DMA
Yes

Annual financials

Trendlyne extraction pending for this company

Pending

Real audited annuals not yet ingested for this company. 25 of 45 companies are covered; this one is queued for the next refresh batch. Synthesized fallback removed — only real numbers will be displayed here.

Management quality

Capital allocation, debt discipline, alignment, governance composite. Computed from disclosed metrics.

Capital allocation
Acceptable returns on capital, room for sharper allocation.
ROCE 18%, div yield 0.0%
Promoter holding
Promoter has strong skin in the game.
56.0%
Promoter pledge
No pledging — cleanest signal.
0.0%
Debt discipline
Comfortable leverage band.
Net Debt/EBITDA 0.80x
Cash conversion
Weak cash conversion — investigate working capital and quality of earnings.
OCF/EBITDA 30%
Governance composite
Some watchpoints; nothing disqualifying.
28/100 risk
Variant perception

What the market is pricing in versus our read, and what would invalidate the thesis.

What the market is pricing in

Optionality from policy and segment leadership, even if near-term technicals are mixed. Patience is being demanded of holders.

What we think it's missing

Direct semiconductor exposure with strong policy alignment is structurally underestimated until project milestones materialize. Re-rating likely to be event-driven, not linear.

Thesis killers
  • ×Working capital blowout disclosed in next quarterly result
  • ×Project execution slip beyond stated commissioning date
  • ×Multiple compression on a single weak earnings print